Subheader Icon 877-412-3651
Article Researchers Created a Novel “Tube-in-Tube” Heat Exchanger Model Image
Image by pisauikan from Pixabay

Researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign have used recent technology advancements to explore the new possibilities in the field of heat exchange, and the published results were vindicating. The team used metal 3D printing to build an ultra-compact unit that follows the “tube-in-tube” approach, and with massive optimizations on all possible points, they derived something that has 20 times higher volumetric power density than even the best commercially available devices of this type.

Heat exchanges are used everywhere, from water to energy and from chemical to aerospace applications, so a compact device that can perform so well has the potential for significant impact across a wide range of industries. Although there are many innovations in engineering, fueled basically by technological, manufacturing, and material advancements, heat exchangers have remained more or less the same, featuring an almost stagnated design. 3D printing of metals is changing that quickly, and this is precisely why the researchers thought it would be a good idea to look into the new possibilities that have been unlocked today. The reason why these concepts were previously impossible to materialize is that they feature optimally shaped fins in the internal tubing. The fin shape and size follow a generic algorithm, so they’re inspired by nature. Genetic algorithms are ideal when dealing with nonlinear and nonconvex problems like heat exchange.

The material used for the tubes is AlSi10Mg, and in numbers, the team measured a power density of 26.6 W/cm3 and a specific power of 15.7 kW/kg. There was no mention in their article about the potential for real-world testing as a potential next phase in the project, but we reckon that this shouldn’t be very far now considering the amazing performance of their device. There are countless industries where exchanger size and performance play a crucial role, so finding candidates shouldn’t be a problem.

Related Articles

Latest China’s World-First Plant Turns 5.56 Million Tons of Mine Waste Into Iron Every Year Image
Industry News

China’s World-First Plant Turns 5.56 Million Tons of Mine Waste Into Iron Every Year

China has started operating a groundbreaking industrial facility that could change how the world looks at mining waste. The plant in Anshan, Liaoning province, can process 5.56 million metric tons of difficult iron ore and mine tailings every year. Turning Mining Waste Into a Resource Mining produces huge amounts of leftover material after valuable minerals are separated from rock. Much of t

Latest Inconel vs Titanium: Strength, Heat Resistance & Cost Compared Image
Metals

Inconel vs Titanium: Strength, Heat Resistance & Cost Compared

The Inconel vs titanium decision comes down to the part’s hardest requirement. Inconel protects strength in extreme heat and aggressive process conditions. Titanium carries structural loads at far less weight, with excellent corrosion resistance. Engineers and buyers should compare specific grades, product forms, heat treatments, and design allowables — not two broad material families. This gui

Latest DOE Funds 10 U.S. Materials Recycling Projects Image
Industry News

DOE Funds 10 U.S. Materials Recycling Projects

Ten research teams will receive $4.8 million to develop materials recovery, remanufacturing and recycling technologies for U.S. manufacturing. Credit: REMADE Institute The U.S. Department of Energy’s REMADE Institute has awarded $4.8 million to 10 materials recycling projects designed to move manufacturing technologies closer to commercial use. Several projects focus directly on aluminium, stee

Latest Metal Hardness Chart: Rockwell vs Brinell vs Vickers Explained Image
Aerospace

Metal Hardness Chart: Rockwell vs Brinell vs Vickers Explained

Hardness measures how well a metal resists permanent deformation. That is, how it holds up when something harder presses into its surface. Rockwell, Brinell, and Vickers are all indentation tests, and they work the same basic way. You push an indenter into the material under a controlled load, then measure what it leaves behind. What separates Rockwell, Brinell, and Vickers is indenter shape, appl